Sara Hassan
  • Photos
    • Galleries by Topic
  • Articles
  • About

Donald Trump dominates presidential candidates’ discourse

9/1/2015

 

New poll puts Trump at the top; other candidates dismiss his rise

Al Jazeera America
In the race for the White House, Donald Trump continues to dominate the political discourse and to keep open the option of a third-party candidacy, telling reporters recently, “We’re going to make a decision very soon, and I think a lot of people are going to be very happy.” With five months to go until the Iowa caucuses, the political landscape remains unsettled, and many of the traditional rules of American politics don’t seem to apply. Bobby Jindal, one of the 17 major declared Republican hopefuls, has called it “the summer of silliness.”

The latest poll, conducted by The Des Moines Register and Bloomberg Politics Aug. 23 through 26, shows Trump surging ahead in Iowa, with 23 percent of likely Republican caucusgoers naming him as their first choice for president. Ben Carson came in second, with 18 percent, followed by Ted Cruz and Scott Walker, with 8 percent each, and Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio, with 6 percent each. On the Democratic side, Hillary Clinton is in the lead, with 37 percent, but Bernie Sanders is shrinking her lead, with 30 percent of the vote. The poll has a margin of error of plus or minus 4.9 percentage points.

During Al Jazeera America’s Sunday night segment The Week Ahead, Del Walters spoke to Clarissa Martinez de Castro, the deputy vice president of the Office of Research, Advocacy and Legislation at the National Council of La Raza, and Brendan Bordelon, a political reporter at The National Review.

When it comes to potential presidential nominees, Martinez said, “It’s too early for any reading of the tea leaves right now about who’s going to be the nominee for either party. But one fact is that this kind of fueling of rhetoric that only seeks to advance fear and anxiety is damaging to the American community. We’re starting to see evidence of that, particularly in a backlash against Latinos in this country, 75 percent of whom are United States citizens.”

She said that Trump is gaining in the polls by riling up the people who are fearful and anxious and that the subject matter is deeper than immigration. She added that anytime there has been change in our country, there has been “backlash on different groups of people.”

Bordelon also said that it’s too early and incredibly hard to predict who the nominees will be. “I think the Republican establishment in Washington doesn’t know what to do and they’re not happy about [Trump’s surge in the polls], but it’s a mistake to go after Trump too hard because the more they do, the more upset they appear and the more his base rallies behind him.”

As for the Democratic side, Bordelon said it’s déjà vu in Iowa, likening Sanders’ surge to Barack Obama’s there in 2012. “But this time, I really don’t think Bernie Sanders is a Barack Obama. He really has none of the charismatic appeal, even though he seems like an honest person” — a perception that he said Clinton has struggled with her entire career. Bordelon said it will be much more of an uphill climb for Sanders than it was for Obama in 2008.

Martinez said the three leading Democratic candidates — Clinton, Sanders and Martin O’Malley — were well received at a recent conference hosted by her organization in Kansas City, Missouri.

“Definitely, Clinton has a great deal of name recognition, and President [Bill] Clinton was very popular with the Latino community, so she has that going for her,” she said, adding that Clinton and O’Malley have been strong in their proposed solutions for the U.S. immigration problem and that their reform plans align with what Latinos believe is needed. Martinez said Sanders was well received on the topic of economic issues.

Martinez said that in every presidential election and many state elections, “Latino voters feel like they have to brace for impact, particularly during the primary period.” She said voters are not only listening to Trump’s incendiary rhetoric but also paying attention to which candidates follow his lead and which ones denounce him and said that will be more important come nomination time.

“In both parties, there’s a deep-seated discontent with the establishment, with the people in Washington, with the big donors and the big money,” said Bordelon. “Just like Hillary Clinton epitomizes that on the left, Jeb Bush epitomizes that on the right. People are very frustrated with Washington, and they see Donald Trump as someone who’s never held elected office, who doesn’t need any political donations, and I think the anti-establishment push cuts primarily against Jeb Bush.”

For the original article, please visit:
http://america.aljazeera.com/watch/shows/live-news/articles/2015/9/1/donald-trump-dominates-presidential-candidates-discourse.html

Ukraine holds parliamentary elections

10/27/2014

 

Ukrainians headed to the polls eight months after uprising started across the country

Al Jazeera America
Ukrainians are voting in parliamentary elections eight months after protests sparked an uprising across the country. Discontent began after President Viktor Yanukovich rejected a trade deal with the European Union. The move was widely seen as a shift away from Europe and a move toward deeper ties with Moscow. Eventually, it led to Yanukovich’s ouster.
Now the crisis has moved far beyond the question of who should be Ukraine’s next leader. Tensions were exacerbated after Russia annexed Crimea, creating the biggest conflict between Moscow and the West since the Cold War. The United States says it wants Russia to stop its military support for Russian separatists in Ukraine. Moscow wants Washington to cut off economic and military aid to Kiev.
During Al Jazeera America's Sunday night segment "The Week Ahead," Thomas Drayton spoke to Amy Knight, a widely published Russia expert, and to Nicolai Petro, professor of politics at the University of Rhode Island.
“The most pressing thing is this election was whether or not the government was going to continue to support the Minsk Peace Initiative,” Petro said, referring to a peace agreement signed last month by the Ukrainian and Russian governments and pro-Russian rebels in eastern Ukraine. “That’s a little bit less certain now that Poroshenko’s party came out as the leading party, but it’s not clear what kind of coalition they will be joining to gain a majority.”  
“It’s probably bad news for the Kremlin,” said Knight. “There’s going to be more support for a stronger line taken against Moscow.”
Knight added that despite Ukraine’s economic problems, it’s important that a democratic process took place.
Given that Moscow has cut off most of the country’s gas supply, Ukraine faces another potential economic crisis as winter approaches. Russia says it acted because Ukraine failed to pay its energy debt. As a result, Kiev tried to buy Russian natural gas from European countries, but that prompted Russia to reduce its sales to those nations.
Petro went on to explain that there are now three main camps in Ukraine’s parliament that will have to determine which path the country should take. He says there’s a radical nationalist group of about 13 percent that includes the Freedom Party; a nationalist pragmatic group of about 40 percent with the largest party being the Popular Front; and a more pragmatic but nationalist bloc, led by President Petro Poroshenko and his party.
Knight says corruption is the biggest issue facing the new parliament.  
About 3 million people in the Luhansk and Donetsk region did not vote in the elections. The separatists plan to hold their own elections next month.
“We will have to see how these elections will be interpreted,” said Petro. “It is important for the peace process to continue to have some sort of popular mandate for the rebel-held areas, so that the people who claim to speak for the rebels can then engage in continued direct negotiations with the elected representatives of the Kiev government.”

For the original article, please visit:
http://america.aljazeera.com/watch/shows/live-news/articles/2014/10/27/ukraine-holds-parliamentaryelections.html

What's at stake in the US election?

9/30/2012

 

As the presidential debates approach, voters focus on health care, women's issues, and - most importantly - the economy

Al Jazeera English
Picture
Kathleen Gallagher, left, says her priority this election is the economy and creation of jobs [Sara Hassan/Al Jazeera]
The conventions are done and the nominations accepted. Now the real race for the White House begins. Americans will watch the upcoming debates closely, when both presidential and vice-presidential candidates face each other and the nation in a bid to win votes in November.The overwhelming majority of Americans say their biggest concern this election season is the state of the economy. But other concerns include women's issues, security, and health care.
Kathleen Gallagher is an architect living in the northeastern US state of Pennsylvania. She says she affiliates herself with libertarians and independents, but tends to vote Democratic. She says women's health issues are important for her, but her top concern this election is the economy and the creation of jobs. She herself is debating whether to apply to a graduate programme or enter the shrinking job market.
Scarce jobs
"My field has evaporated," she says. "I'm renegotiating my career. It was never hard to find a job. Now there are simply not enough jobs to go around for the demand of employment." While she does not expect the economy to blossom over the next four years, she hopes it will at least turn around.
Gallagher explains that Obama's presidency did not meet her expectations. "I feel like he's backed down on some issues," she says. "He extended Bush-era tax cuts. And his health care bill was not representative of Democrats, but rather conciliatory to Republicans."
Her thoughts on the economy are echoed by Tony Hazel, 52, a structural engineer and a Republican from the southern state of South Carolina. He believes the economy should be the top priority for the next president. Hazel has had his house up for sale and hopes to move into a bigger one. He says he is in no rush, but that it does not seem to be a buyers' market.

Hazel agrees that job creation is essential. "I think the government needs to stop spending money, whatever that looks like, and cut taxes," he says. "Those who create jobs in the private sector give people the opportunity to get off social programmes so they can fend for themselves." He believes there should be a national energy policy for alternative energy sources. "We need to explore wind, solar, and bio-fuel components to get off oil. I think oil is fuelling lots of problems in the world, our fault and others' as well."
Picture
Tony Hazel from Columbia, South Carolina, believes that job creation is a top concern[Sara Hassan/Al Jazeera]
President Barack Obama and Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney have sparred over their plans for the economy. One of the main points of contention is taxes.
Recently, Romney has been criticised by Democrats for pointing out that 47 per cent of Americans live off government benefits. Obama has responded by saying that the group includes veterans and the elderly.
And Republicans have rebuked Obama for his plan to roll back tax cuts on wealthy Americans, and for not turning the economy around during his four years in office.
Hazel says Obama inherited a bad economy, and that it may be partly the fault of the former Bush administration. He says Obama's term wasn't necessarily better or worse, but that it just had different challenges. He does not agree with Obama's health care programme - the centrepiece of which requires all Americans to purchase health insurance or else pay penalties - and says that the government should not force anyone to do anything.
And while privacy rights have been a contentious issue in the US, Hazel says airport screenings are fair, and he doesn't mind full-body scans to check for explosives. He says that Obama has maintained Bush's security policies and that there have been no terrorist attacks in the US since he took office as a result.
Dorothy, who lives in the same neighbourhood, is also hoping for a better economy. She is a Democrat and says her views are not very popular in the South. "I feel like I'm always defending my ideas here," she says. Dorothy voted for Obama and plans to vote for him again this year. She says many of the economic woes of the country stem from the preceding Bush era and that Obama's term in office was much better.
Live Box 20121816112138306And on the other side of the country, Danny Kish, 23, an executive assistant at a law firm in Los Angeles, California, says he is closer to the Democratic Party but that it doesn't define all of his political beliefs. He agrees with Dorothy that Obama's term in office was better than the previous administration.
But he says Democrats and Republicans need to stop fighting each other and work together to find solutions to serve the American people. "I want to see the economy improving, more jobs created, and fewer people living in poverty," he says. 
And in Obama's home city of Chicago in the Midwest, Andrew Fedele, 24, says, "I don't care what you do in your personal life, but I prefer a more fiscally conservative government." Fedele is an accountant and a libertarian. He says the issue of taxes is essential, but that the most important issue for him is repealing Obama's health care programme.
Sherrod Bridgers, 25, also says health care is an important issue - but, in contrast to Fedele, supports most of Obama's health care plan. "I have a low-paying job and have expensive medication I take every month," says Bridgers, a data coordinator at a women's liberal arts college in the South . "I cannot afford it and depend on someone else to pay for it."
But for Bridgers, the most important issues are women's rights and lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender ( LGBT) rights. "My rights are being stripped away from me every day as a woman and it's appalling and dangerous. I want to take steps to stop this movement."
As for Gallagher back in Pennsylvania, she says, "This election is going to be very telling about the American people and where they stand". She says both candidates will become less extreme and find a middle ground. "By election day we will have two pretty centrist candidates, one black and one white."
For the original article, please visit:
http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/spotlight/us2012/2012/09/201293064245814832.html

Egypt's expats vote for president

5/16/2012

 

A sense of euphoria sweeps embassies as Egyptians living abroad exercise their franchise to decide on next leader

Al Jazeera English
Picture
Expatriates have until May 17 to cast their vote in the election [Sara Hassan/Al Jazeera]
New York, NY - Egypt's landmark presidential poll is still a week away, but thousands of Egyptians living abroad are already lining up at their respective embassies to cast their ballots.

Polls are open at 166 diplomatic missions worldwide until May 17 for the estimated 600,000 expatriates who are eligible to vote.

The presidential race is crowded with 13 candidates in the field, and the expat community is divided over whom the next leader should be.

But what binds them together is their craving for change, and the restoration of dignity back home.

Varied views
"We don't want to be second-class citizens in our own country," said Wesam, an Egyptian woman who has been living in Qatar for seven years with her husband, Mohammed. They have two young children.

They said they had been planning to support Hazem Abu Ismail, a Salafi politician who was considered one of the frontrunners - until he was declared ineligible because his mother held US citizenship. Now they are backing Abdel Moneim Aboul Fotouh, an independent candidate who was formerly a member of the Muslim Brotherhood.  
In a neighboring Gulf country, Kaiser Moussa wants no Islamic influence in the new Egyptian government. Moussa is a filmmaker from the port city of Alexandria and has been living in Dubai in the United Arab Emirates for four years. He believes none of the candidates deserve the top post in his country, and plans to boycott the election.He said he would only vote for Hamdeen Sabahi, head of the Dignity Party, if he becomes one of the top two contenders - but does not expect him to make it to that level. "The system is not ready for a fair scientific voting procedure," said Moussa.

Moussa's friend Kareem is an architect and has been living in Dubai since 2007. He also does not like any of the candidates.

"Each one has its negative," said Kareem. "They are all influenced by their backgrounds and are driven by the extreme right or left." Kareem said he was upset that none of the candidates have come out and directly criticised Egypt's Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF), and believes the military is protecting the old regime.
Egypt's Presidential Candidates
 Amr Moussa, Independent

 Abdel Moneim Aboul Fotouh, Independent

 Ahmed Shafiq, Independent

 Mohamed Morsi, Freedom and Justice Party

 Hamdeen Sabahi, Dignity Party

 Mohdem Selim al-Awa, Independent

 Abul-Ezz Al-Hariri, Socialist Popular Alliance

 Khaled Ali, Independent

 Hisham al-Bastawisi, Tagammu

 Hossam Khairallah, Democratic Peace

 Mohamed Fawzy, Democratic Generation

 Mahmoud Hossam, Independent

 Abdullah El-Ashaal, Authenticity Party
Kareem had planned to boycott the vote, but will cast a ballot as a "rescue plan" to ensure that an extremist candidate is not voted into power. Moussa said he believes the Muslim Brotherhood are "snakes" and would tailor the constitution to suit their own purposes.
But Mohamed El Gohary, a banker who has lived in London for more than 15 years, disagreed. Originally from Port Said, El Gohary has spent most of his life in Europe and the Gulf. He is still deciding whether to vote for Aboul Fotouh or Mohammed Moursi of the Brotherhood-linked Freedom and Justice Party. 
He said that the Muslim Brotherhood did not initially field a candidate, so as not to scare the other parties, and it turned out to be a strategic error on their part.

"A big bang approach to changing the system is not the best of things," says El Gohary. "They want to continue with a semi-parliamentary system and only submitted a candidate when they thought someone was trying to undermine parliament."  

He added that living in the UK or Europe gives one "the best of both worlds", given that one can keep an Egyptian identity while being exposed to other ideas.

Sense of euphoria
Nancy Elshami also lives in the West. She was born and raised in the United States and is an economic researcher in New York City. Her family travels to Egypt every year.

Elshami voted for Aboul Fotouh, even though she prefers Sabahi more as a candidate. "I don't think Sabahi has a good chance of winning," she said. "It's more of a strategic vote for me."
Live Box 20111120475439857Elshami will travel to Cairo this week to help with Aboul Fotouh's campaign.

"Aboul Fotouh's affiliation with political Islam makes him a more familiar candidate," says Elshami. "The fact that he has a female leftist as his campaign manager speaks volumes to me about the direction of his presidential programme."

Back at the embassies, a sense of euphoria spreads through the lines as voters near the polling stations. After completing the identification process, each voter signs their name, chooses a candidate, and casts a vote by dropping it in the ballot box.

It is a small step to influence an uncertain political future.
For the original article, please visit:
http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2012/05/201251675547381505.html

Expats divided on South Sudan's independence

7/8/2011

 

The estimated 35,000 Sudanese expatriates in Qatar can only watch from afar as their nation splits in two on Saturday

Al Jazeera English
Picture
Sudanese expatriates Abu Bakr Farooq Abdel Aziz, Abdel Aal Hammour, Tariq Hamed, and a friend discuss the politics of their home country at a shisha restaurant in Doha, Qatar [Sara Hassan/Al Jazeera]
Sudanese expatriate Abdel Aal Hammour recently sat down with some friends over a water pipe in a Doha cafe, but his thoughts were far away. He has lived in Qatar for 10 years, but, like many foreign workers, he remains closely connected to events back home.

For most of this year, Hammour, a 38-year-old quality control officer for Qatar Airways, has been following the aftermath of a January 9 referendum in which the newly named South Sudan voted to separate from the Northern Republic of Sudan and form its own country. The decision, taking effect on Saturday, will leave what was once Africa's largest nation split in two.
The separation follows a 2005 peace deal that ended some 27 years of civil war between the north and south that killed an estimated 1.5 million Sudanese soldiers and civilians. Even so, many Sudanese are concerned the division may have the same polarising effect on the population.
"Sudan is very unique. It is a mixture, like a beautiful painting with dozens of [colors].  We are Arabs and Africans.  Our land is made up of desert and green," said Hammour, a native of North Sudan who finds the decision unfortunate. 
"The Sudanese people have great sorrow because of this separation.  It’s as if a part of them has been taken away." The Sudanese Embassy in Doha estimates there are around 35,000 Sudanese expatriates living in Qatar. Like Hammour and his friends, the majority of Sudanese living in Doha, and across the Gulf region, are from the north. For the most part, Northern Sudanese share the same language and religion as other people in the Arab world.

Confessional divide
Yet expatriates from South Sudan, which is made up predominately of Christians and people practicing tribal religions, have a very different stance on Saturday's separation.
"At last we are free," said Agoyom Akomjo Musellam, senior legal counselor for Qatar Telecommunications in Doha and a native of South Sudan who left in 1995 and has since lived in Saudi Arabia, Oman and Qatar.

"We are free from the bondage of successive political regimes, including the government of Sudan, the Turkish and Egyptian regimes and the British," he added.
The opinions of all Sudanese are hardly so equally divided along geographic, or ethno-religious lines, explained Santos Oryem, a 25-year Doha resident and employee at Qatar Petroleum. He said that he has many friends from the north and south.
"This is the nature of the Sudanese people," said Oryem. "The division is only a political one."
Another Southerner, Veronica Oryem, a lawyer in Doha who was born in Khartoum,viewed the impending division in practical terms: "Southerners were not getting equal opportunities, but we are still one people. I hope visa issues can be resolved between the two countries so the northerners can visit us in the south."
Yet she is one of many Sudanese who have welcomed the separation.
"This should have happened a long time ago," she said.

Celebrations
Veronica's family, as well as southerner Agoyom Musellam, have traveled to Juba, the capital of the new 10-state Republic of South Sudan, to attend festivities to celebrate the formation of the 196th nation in the world and 193rd country inducted into the United Nations.  Veronica's father is arranging a large feast for family and friends.
 
"This is an occasion you cannot stay away from," said Santos Oryem. 
Back in Doha, however, the mostly north Sudanese expatriate crowd has little to look forward to on Saturday.
"We are just waiting for the event, but do not have any specific plans," said Abdul Rahman Bashir Al Tahir, chairman of the Sudanese Community in Doha. He added that some Sudanese may choose to watch the events on television, but he knew of no scheduled gatherings.
Some Sudanese working in Doha, such as businessman Omer Ibrahim Hassan, think that the separation may lead to further conflict in their battle-scarred homeland. Hassan, who moved to Doha from Khartoum only a year ago, admits that southerners were treated like "second-class citizens by the north" and should be able to "taste a bit of independence".
Still, he said if South Sudan ever chooses to return to an alliance with the north, he would welcome the reunification.
"The whole place is my country," he said.  
As a range of Sudanese expatriates said, the "whole place" will now become two countries which both face a multitude of challenges. Disputes over oil revenue, land rights and minority issues continue to simmer below the surface of any tenuous agreements.
Despite the underlying issues, however, South Sudan's secession and independence are set for Saturday and history is set to witness, yet again, the emergence of a brand new nation.

For the original article, please visit:
http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2011/07/20117710351358182.html

    Categories

    All
    Africa
    East Asia
    Economy
    Elections
    Employment
    Environment
    Europe
    Health
    International
    Latin America
    Middle East
    Politics
    Religion
    South Asia
    Technology
    US

    Archives

    August 2016
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    October 2013
    September 2013
    September 2012
    May 2012
    July 2011
    February 2011

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Photos
    • Galleries by Topic
  • Articles
  • About